With the confidence of businessmen and the use of modern tools and methods, in addition to regulating the market and achieving the rights of the state, rents and corruption can be blocked.
Blind knot is a term used in political, cultural, and even societal literature that is used in some societies due to ambiguities and confusion. The meaning of this term in the ordinary and ordinary citizens is that, in order not to do a job, the issues of that work are so complex that the end, lost, and lost. Now imagine a group that wants to blunt nodes so that these nodes never open. Additionally, imagine that blind blind nodes are not opened up, and no one has the ability and courage to take steps to unlock them.
Unfortunately, we must say that the Iranians are now in the various sectors of economic activity, such as production, domestic trade, foreign trade, transportation, taxation, banking, and other activities, for various reasons, with such blind nodes that are subject to the above characteristics. The first feature is that these nodes are deliberately left with our hands on economic activities like foreign trade. The second feature is that the blind nodes are blind and curved, and opening them requires extraordinary effort. These blind nodes in the multi-layered import and interconnected nodes have removed work from normal conditions.
In the very first months after the victory of the Islamic Revolution and in an atmosphere of emotion, we directed public opinion to the point that the merchants and businessmen who interact externally are the comprador bourgeoisie, and their losses to the economy and the country are also greater than the industrial bourgeoisie. In this thought of the mind formed in the bipolar world and the Cold War, merchants, in particular the importers of the bakeries of imperialism, zaloushts and bloodthirsty, ... were introduced. But this literature, created by the described minds, should find abundance in the real world. In the years after the Islamic Revolution, programs for foreign trade and government were prepared and discussed for a long time. The work came as Guardian Council arrived and the bill went into the air. In those days, those who quoted Imam Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, said that the government should not take all the trade, and the story ended. However, it was thought that imports of goods by individuals were subject to government restrictions. At the same time and in order to provide import to the government, the Ministry of Commerce established distribution centers for various types of goods and, until the end of the imposed war, these centers were operating.
The purpose of expressing these historical events is to show the distrust of the state institution, and perhaps even better, to say that the institution of government, which includes the government and the parliament, and other institutions, has been negatively affected by imports. After the end of the war and the normalization of Iran's economic life, and the opening of the government's minds and in the actions of the government towards the economy, and in particular the Ministry of Economy, by the late Nourbakhsh, the organization of the program by Massoud Roghani Zanjani and the Central Bank by Mohammad Hussein Adeli The reason for the look of these three economic commanders was reduced to free trade. However, the curtailment of the currency created in the early 1990s and its subsequent years led foreign exchange managers to curtail foreign exchange currencies. Ordering to import goods from merchants in the 1370s was put on the agenda for controlling currency charges and is still ongoing. An order for import in the Ministry of Commerce is a process that has been accepted, but it imposes some shortcomings on the flow of foreign trade.
In these days, when the registration of car imports from the Trade Development Organization has been blocked and the market for imported cars has been thrilled, discussions about the sovereignty of public institutions and organizations on foreign trade, including the obligation of merchants to register import orders, have been highlighted. . Conscious observers believe that the continuation of restrictions on import of goods with the continuation of the previous methods occurs only because of the need to control foreign exchange costs and to regulate the market through the creation of a balance between domestic production and the amount of imports for the state. In addition, while in today's economy the Iranian economy seems to have strong supporters, the government has also sought to identify taxpayers and taxpayers, as well as tolls and customs duties, through the import order. Currently, there are different perspectives on the conditions and the continued imposition of restrictions on imports through the application of the ordering regulations, as an example of legal constraints.
Some views, in particular, from the import bureaucracy, such as the Trade and Customs Development Organization, argued that it would be impossible to freely market the market and allow any organization and the individual to legalize any goods of any quality and quantity to the market, Continue to exist. Of course, some believe that if the restrictions imposed on foreign trade are eliminated, managers of various devices lose their existing philosophy, which is why they are resisting theoreticizing and, in practice, by senior executives and senior staff of these organizations to reduce or possibly eliminate these regulations. Can be seen.
Continuing to restrict foreign trade is also a way to end the current deterrent rules, but also hardliners. Extreme hardline opponents on imports and tightening requirements